Write a critical Review of Qualitative Research Articles?

Introduction

This critique is about the research article titled 'Nurses' attitudes towards enforced measures to increase influenza vaccination: A qualitative study' authored by Anina Pless, David Shaw, Stuart McLennan and Bernice S. Elger and published in the NCBI Journal, Influenza and Other Respiratory Diseases in May 2017. The purpose of this article is to understand the reason behind low influenza vaccination rates among the healthcare workers. This study is significant due to their interaction with vulnerable patients despite educational programmes to advocate this issue. The authors are from the biomedical ethics background which assures their knowledge and expertise in conducting this research related to the identified issue.  The thesis statement is clearly stated as 'To examine the attitudes of non‐vaccinated nursing staff towards various enforced measures aimed at increasing rates of influenza vaccination'. This study is important considering the lower vaccination rates among the nursing staff which has resulted in the implementation of enforced approaches to vaccinate them and safeguard patients susceptible to influenza. Both the ethical and behavioural aspects are given due diligence to enhance the acceptability of influenza vaccination.

Summary

Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research? 

Yes, the research aims are clearly stated. The primary objective of the research is to explore the attitudes of non‐vaccinated nursing staff who care for high-risk patients. The secondary objective is to he determines whether there is a common reaction towards enforced measures among them. The study aims to discuss the issue aforementioned with the staff involved. This would allow the authors to understand nursing staff attitude towards influenza non-vaccination and device recommendations accordingly.

(Some parts of the solution has been blurred due to privacy protection policy)